Part of being pastor, in fact part of being a follower of
Christ, is seeking to feel the pulse of the community that is beloved by God.
The Gospel is making each one of us more relevant to the communities in which
we live. The gospel is transforming, good news that matters to the left-out and
the left-down, and it is calling each of us to make a difference. When Christ
is aware of the suffering that is pressed upon the people in the margins,
Christ brings healing. Would the body of Christ in our time, the church, be
held to a lower standard?
Luke 13:10-17
Common
English Bible (CEB)
Healing on a Sabbath
10 Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues on the Sabbath. 11 A
woman was there who had been disabled by a spirit for eighteen years. She was
bent over and couldn’t stand up straight. 12 When he saw her,
Jesus called her to him and said, “Woman, you are set free from your sickness.”
13 He placed his hands on her and she straightened up at once
and praised God.
14 The synagogue leader, incensed that Jesus had healed on the
Sabbath, responded, “There are six days during which work is permitted. Come
and be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath day.”
15 The Lord replied, “Hypocrites! Don’t each of you on the
Sabbath untie your ox or donkey from its stall and lead it out to get a drink? 16
Then isn’t it necessary that this woman, a daughter of Abraham, bound by Satan
for eighteen long years, be set free from her bondage on the Sabbath day?” 17 When
he said these things, all his opponents were put to shame, but all those in the
crowd rejoiced at all the extraordinary things he was doing.
I was in Jack in the Box Wednesday morning waiting for my
appointed meeting time with one of us when I was engaged in an eye opening
conversation. A disabled vet from the
Vietnam era came to the counter in a wheel chair; his legs were amputated as a
result of diabetes. (Just a note, this condition is very common in poor
communities) He knew the teller at the restaurant who was a retirement aged Euro-American
woman. The question was, “how is this new healthcare system going to hit you?”
Her answer was more than disappointing.
She recalled that her period of unemployment had finally found relief
and that she was happy to be off of the unemployment rolls. It was
exceptionally hard for a woman her age to secure a job. Unfortunately, she was about to file
unemployment again. The corporation that she was working for realized that full
time employees would require health coverage. In response, they were turning a
large percentage of their positions into part- time positions. As a result she
would need unemployment benefits until she could secure a second job that held
together body and soul.
Who is keeping the poor and the infirmed bound? I wonder to
myself. We complain that governments never doing anything to help us. When they
do, are we supporting obstacles that bind us up into cycles of scarcity and
need? Are we part of a system that sustains and/or creates poverty? Do I need
my burger to be so cheap that corporations are justified in creating a margin
that artificially inflates poverty?
The power surge is not limited to corporations – in many
cases the governmental systems are contributing to the injustices at the
margin. Here is the news. “In 36 mostly red states, HHS will be enrolling
people via online applications at healthcare.gov
because (some) local Republicans have refused to set up state-run exchanges.
For these states and their largest cities, HHS listed premiums and subsidies
called a tax credit. The credits go directly to insurers monthly; they are not
refunded in a lump sum after filing one’s yearly taxes. (Rosenfeld,
2013)”
I understand that the argument about whether Affordable Health Care is a
benefit is not over, but it seems that proving the point is a tug of war in
which the poorest among us are the rope.
Lower to moderate income households are well cared for in
theory.” The subsidies would be given to households earning between 100 percent
and 400 percent of the federal poverty level. In 2013, that’s individuals
making $11,490 to $46,000; two-person families earning between $19,530 and
$78,120; and four-person families making between $23,550 and $94,200. These
thresholds are revised yearly by the government. (Rosenfeld,
2013)”
This looks promising, but the biting truth is that we are still creating cracks
through which the poorest among us will slip.
Here is an obvious shortfall. “There is one big exception to this rosy
scenario that will unfairly impact an estimated 5.5 million truly poor people,
thanks to (some) Republican governors and the U.S. Supreme Court. Obamacare
expanded Medicaid’s eligibility to all people whose incomes were under the
federal poverty line. (Medicaid is the state-run program for the poor and
people with disabilities.) The Supreme Court ruled that states could opt out of
Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion when it upheld the law. Twenty-two red states
have done so, according to the Urban Institute. As a result, there’s a coverage
gap in these states because people’s sub-poverty line incomes are still too
high to qualify for Medicaid, but not high enough to trigger the tax credits to
help them buy policies in the Obamacare marketplaces. (Rosenfeld,
2013)”
Are we really willing to allow this argument to take place
on these particular theaters of conflict? The poorest among us – those
struggling at the very edge of economic health, those whose capabilities, or
social locations, or arbitrary circumstances have pushed them into an eddy of
financial stress, are being bound and we might be tempted to blame the system
and let it continue. What’s your reading? Would Jesus, the one we follow, buck
the system and set the suffering free? Shouldn’t left-down and left-out be a
temporary condition on the kin_dom of God? Sometimes those in the gathering
place are protecting their assets more than caring for the sick. Jesus finds it
necessary to challenge this. Do we?
No comments:
Post a Comment