I dare you to
think of all the ways that God is prodigal as we explore the stories of the
Christ event – God revealed. We all have an implied definition of the word
prodigal, which is based on how we understand the story in Luke 15, sometimes
titled the “prodigal son.” Because the son makes a plan to enter back into the
grace of his father by confessing sin, we equate the word prodigal with sinful,
but this isn’t really accurate. Here is
one definition adj. - spending money or resources freely and
recklessly; wastefully extravagant. (i.e. “prodigal habits die hard") Here
is a second, having or giving something on a lavish scale. (i.e. "the
dessert was crunchy with brown sugar and prodigal with whipped cream").
So, if our image of the word prodigal were not hardened by our judgments of the
son in Luke’s story, would we be able to see the prodigal in God?
To review the story, Pharisees and
scribes were grumbling, like only the righteous authorities can do. “This
fellow welcomes sinners and eats with them.” So Jesus goes into story mode. As
if it were a foregone conclusion; Jesus posits, “Who among you wouldn’t leave
your 99 sheep in search of just one that was lost?” We, from the culture of “a
bird in the hand is worth two in the bush,” might be forced to admit that we
wouldn’t do this. Why risk all that you have for the “nonessential, the
inconsequential, the insignificant? Then he goes on, lost a coin? “who among
you would not spend significant time and effort in searching and take even more
time in celebrating?” Again, we from the culture of “Time is Money” might be
tempted to make very pragmatic decisions. So let’s get prodigal.
The son is scandalous. He has the good
fortune of being part of a family with wealth and position. He would have a
duty to serve his family and then the honor of receiving a share of the
family’s’ assets. But he breaks with tradition. He seems to under value the
cultural norms. He takes the inheritance of the father to another country. He
squanders all that is his, all to which he is entitled, he is charged with
dissolute living. His brother complains that he devoured the father’s property
with prostitutes. He enters into a time of famine. He feels starved and
abandoned. He aches for the comfort of home, even a comfort that was a fraction
of what he has had in the past. His loss is real and profound – the squandering
is complete. This reminds me of a description of Jesus.
Phil 2:5-11
5Let the same mind be in
you that was in Christ Jesus, 6who, though he was in the form of
God, did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, 7but
emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness. And
being found in human form, 8he humbled himself and became obedient
to the point of death— even death on a cross. 9Therefore God also
highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, 10so
that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on earth and
under the earth, 11and every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ
is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
The father has actions and emotions that force us to re-imagine the meaning of fatherhood; challenge the relationship between
authority and love. When the son is still far off the father’s heart was filled
with compassion and he sets out in a full run; an embarrassing display of
affection that would be far beneath the authority of his position in the
culture. But he doesn’t stop here, he takes the son completely back, robing the
son, and giving the son back his place at the table. He celebrates raucously; for
example, “… with all the people on earth and all the company in heaven and
joining an unending hymn.” When the father is challenged by the righteous
family member, this is his response, “We have to celebrate and rejoice…your
brother was dead and now he is alive.” How many fathers have these words to
say? How many fathers have been redefined by their loving response to a
squandering son?
“Love is recklessness, not reason.
Reason seeks profit,
Love comes on strong. Consuming
herself,
Unabashed”
(From a poem By Mathnawi Rumi)
The brother appears with familiar
identifying markers as well. He is the part of the family that has attempted to
obey every cultural expectation. He is the one casting aspersions on the
squandering son, “He devoured your property on prostitutes” on sinners. He
expects reward for his behavior and is jealous that the father is handing out
gifts that are unearned. Finally he is taught by the father not to question the
father’s love for him and to draw the circle of acceptance wider – the
squanderer is restored.
This is the story that was told in
response to the grumbling of the Pharisees and the scribes. Do you see a
prodigal God in this story?
Jesus has often referred to himself as
a son of God, “I am in my father’s house”. Jesus has often referred to God as
father; saying this is how you pray “’abba’, who art in heaven…” Can we see the
possibility that Jesus was telling the Pharisees and scribes the whole story?
My squandering is intentional. I have a great inheritance, but I will give it
all away. I will squander it on sinners and prostitutes. I will let go of all
that I have and all that I am. I will be famished. I will feel forsaken. I will
long for home and feel so set apart from it. But the father will demonstrate an
unimaginable compassion. The father will be redefined by love rather than
authority and the son will be restored. What is more, there is neither
exclusion nor exclusiveness in store for the righteous, the culturally
obedient.
It is God’s choice and God’s right to
be prodigal and it has made all the difference. God revealed is a God that lets
go of everything; power, identity, honor, even body. The prodigal God has
demonstrated the power to fill the empty hand, the empty life, the empty. It is
a distribution of God’s resources that would seem to anyone watching to be
free, reckless, and wastefully extravagant. It is a distribution of grace that
could only be described as lavish in scale. “The squandering son –restored” is
our hope and our guide. In what ways can we let go? Can we have faith that an
empty hand is but a fresh vessel for the abundance that waits? What is our
relationship to the resources we have been given? What have we done to make
room for the resources that are yet to come our way? Can it be that the
squandering son is a good steward?
No comments:
Post a Comment